26

Re: If Bush ran against Jesus

That was hilarious Mold  lol
where did you find it?

__________________________________________________________________________________
I didn't read all of that but the bits i read made me think that "no one at all" was pretty much an obnoxious moron.
Also why are you hiding behind that name? Why not reveal your real "game identity" or what ever.

You guys asked me in the previous topic. I told you who I am. Practice your reading skills and go to it, buddy.

And Roach, do not try to get into an arguement you cannot win just like your friend Gothic.

27

Re: If Bush ran against Jesus

Here is the main points of your constant arguements against me:

1. I insulted your intellegence

2. I am immature

3. I cannot stand up for myself

You have repeated these 3 things in almost every post you have written, in both topics. This has forced me, each time, to try and dumb it down a little more so you might be able to understand. And yet for some reason it still hasn't worked. You seem to be in denial about being able to best me in our little debate over your self esteem, but I assure you it is not true. At some point everybody has to give up when the person just keeps repeating themselves. You even turned one of my arguements, which I was hoping to be a political debate, into an attack on yourself and dragged it on and on and on. Which leaves me to the conclusion that you are an attention starved person. Molding and framing everything that comes your way into a personal assault so you can defend yourself meaninglessly.

"We are a mass of seething fury, elected as your judge and jury. You stand accused of murder, vanity, and evil crimes against humanity."-Andy Martin

28

Re: If Bush ran against Jesus

Here is the main points of your constant arguements against me:

1. I insulted your intellegence

2. I am immature

3. I cannot stand up for myself

You have repeated these 3 things in almost every post you have written, in both topics. This has forced me, each time, to try and dumb it down a little more so you might be able to understand. And yet for some reason it still hasn't worked. You seem to be in denial about being able to best me in our little debate over your self esteem, but I assure you it is not true. At some point everybody has to give up when the person just keeps repeating themselves. You even turned one of my arguements, which I was hoping to be a political debate, into an attack on yourself and dragged it on and on and on. Which leaves me to the conclusion that you are an attention starved person. Molding and framing everything that comes your way into a personal assault so you can defend yourself meaninglessly.

And every post you make is about my 'self esteem' or my 'ego'.

You see, Gothic, you are self-absorbed. You are not use to people arguing with you because you think you are better than everyone else. I am the one who dumbs down everything I say because you do not realize what I am saying.

Gee, I am saying the same things over and over again. That is because your little mind is not recognizing what I am saying.

29

Re: If Bush ran against Jesus

ooooooo...Gothic has a fan/stalker...

Theology: The study of elaborate verbal disguises for non-ideas

30

Re: If Bush ran against Jesus

ooooooo...Gothic has a fan/stalker...

Don't feel jealous.

You're next  smile

31

Re: If Bush ran against Jesus

ooooooo...Gothic has a fan/stalker...

Seriously...

"We are a mass of seething fury, elected as your judge and jury. You stand accused of murder, vanity, and evil crimes against humanity."-Andy Martin

32

Re: If Bush ran against Jesus

You guys asked me in the previous topic. I told you who I am. Practice your reading skills and go to it, buddy.

Unlike you, i don't have chance to read each and every topic.
Also rather than typing all that bullshit, couldn't you have just put "I am ____<<<< name goes here."
Although as i think mold said somewhere, "No one at all" kinda suits you.

I'm Roachies

33

Re: If Bush ran against Jesus

You guys asked me in the previous topic. I told you who I am. Practice your reading skills and go to it, buddy.

Unlike you, i don't have chance to read each and every topic.
Also rather than typing all that bullshit, couldn't you have just put "I am ____<<<< name goes here."
Although as i think mold said somewhere, "No one at all" kinda suits you.

Apparently you did read it then. Try not to be such a hypocrite next time, eh?

34

Re: If Bush ran against Jesus

If i'd read it, i'd know who you are.
roll
Apperently you took what i criticised you about and then just decided to replicate it. I'd expect nothing more from you though.

Also
Why the hell are you so stubborn and narrow minded? I'm sure if you act like this in real life you must have MAJOR ISSUES getting on in everyday life.
I took the time to read the full argument between you and gothic, he said repeatedly and started off by saying he was not sincerely insulting your intelligence in anyway because he had no way of knowing your true intelligence. You repeatedly ignored this.
I imagine you chose to ignore this for one of two reasons:
1) As gothic said you are attention starved and enjoy arguing with people just for the pure attention you get from it.
2) You can't stand to be wrong and you are a highly ego-driven individual therefore you didn't see backing down and admitting you were wrong in the first place as an option.
3) You are so stupid or perhaps stubborn and narrow minded, you lacked the ability to see you were wrong.

Which of these options would you pick?
If you have a fourth option please do enlighten me. Short of that, just stop posting and making an idiot of yourself.

I'm Roachies

35

Re: If Bush ran against Jesus

If i'd read it, i'd know who you are.
roll
Apperently you took what i criticised you about and then just decided to replicate it. I'd expect nothing more from you though.

Also
Why the hell are you so stubborn and narrow minded? I'm sure if you act like this in real life you must have MAJOR ISSUES getting on in everyday life.
I took the time to read the full argument between you and gothic, he said repeatedly and started off by saying he was not sincerely insulting your intelligence in anyway because he had no way of knowing your true intelligence. You repeatedly ignored this.
I imagine you chose to ignore this for one of two reasons:
1) As gothic said you are attention starved and enjoy arguing with people just for the pure attention you get from it.
2) You can't stand to be wrong and you are a highly ego-driven individual therefore you didn't see backing down and admitting you were wrong in the first place as an option.
3) You are so stupid or perhaps stubborn and narrow minded, you lacked the ability to see you were wrong.

Which of these options would you pick?
If you have a fourth option please do enlighten me. Short of that, just stop posting and making an idiot of yourself.

1) If I am so attention starved, please, humor me and explain why. I gave you guys plenty of chances to drop the arguement. You didn't. You guys are the ones who are attention starved.

2) I can stand to be wrong. But in this case, I'm not.

3) Are you people too ignorant to back up what you say? Describe to me, why am I stubborn or narrow-minded? I gave you guys chances to lose the arguement with dignity, you didn't. YOU guys are the stubborn ones. Narrow-minded? Please, you are just getting upset because I can prove what I say and you cannot.

36

Re: If Bush ran against Jesus

First of all, i gave those as three options, i didn't say each and everyone was true.
As for what you said to defend yourself i'm literally laughing out loud, what you said is so deeply flawed in nearly every possible way i don't feel the need to back my previous statement/question up.

I'm Roachies

37

Re: If Bush ran against Jesus

First of all, i gave those as three options, i didn't say each and everyone was true.
As for what you said to defend yourself i'm literally laughing out loud, what you said is so deeply flawed in nearly every possible way i don't feel the need to back my previous statement/question up.

You never said they weren't true. You gave three options, I defended myself against all three. Deal with it.

Explain how it is flawed? Let me guess, you won't/can't.

38

Re: If Bush ran against Jesus

1) If I am so attention starved, please, humor me and explain why. I gave you guys plenty of chances to drop the arguement. You didn't. You guys are the ones who are attention starved.

Well, it's a clear option you refuse to back down when you are wrong so that the person you are arguing with gives you more attention. Also you say you gave "us" opportunity to drop the argument, do tell me where?
Finally you kept making the same argument over and over again. Gothic tried to explain over and over again, that you had got the wrong idea. Yet each and everytime you cam back with the same argument.

2) I can stand to be wrong. But in this case, I'm not.

Amazing how everyone who has read this topic thinks your wrong except you isn't it?

3) Are you people too ignorant to back up what you say? Describe to me, why am I stubborn or narrow-minded? I gave you guys chances to lose the arguement with dignity, you didn't. YOU guys are the stubborn ones. Narrow-minded? Please, you are just getting upset because I can prove what I say and you cannot.

None of ushad "to loose with dignity", because none of us were wrong. You didn't show you were right. Infact, the more you went on the more you looked more misguided.

There, you have the three flaws with you poorly though out arguments.
Now read it properly, we both know how you are with missing the point.

I'm Roachies

39

Re: If Bush ran against Jesus

Well, it's a clear option you refuse to back down when you are wrong so that the person you are arguing with gives you more attention. Also you say you gave "us" opportunity to drop the argument, do tell me where?
Finally you kept making the same argument over and over again. Gothic tried to explain over and over again, that you had got the wrong idea. Yet each and everytime you cam back with the same argument.

I just love how you word your sentences. There is no option of me 'refusing to back down'. Using sentence structure would be nice. I'm not even going to bother reading the rest of those paragraphs.

Amazing how everyone who has read this topic thinks your wrong except you isn't it?

177 views. Yeah, sure looks like it. Only around 3 people think I am wrong. Guess what, they are all friends of yours or each other! What a coincidence!

None of ushad "to loose with dignity", because none of us were wrong. You didn't show you were right. Infact, the more you went on the more you looked more misguided.

There, you have the three flaws with you poorly though out arguments.
Now read it properly, we both know how you are with missing the point.

Look at what I have previously said. The only reason why I have no backed myself up and/or proven my facts is because it has been done in an earlier reply of mine.

What the hell is an "ushad"? What word is even close to be spelled like that? You guys were/are wrong. That is why everyone except you has stopped arguing with me. I will prove you wrong in every sentence I type.

The only flaws are your typing skills and poor sentence structure. I fail to recognize how what I said was a "flaw"?

Yes, you beat me in the popularity contest. More people do agree with you, but this isn't survivor, your mindless bashing still doesn't prove anything, no matter how many people you have. Once you can actually back yourself up instead of saying "lol I got more friends then you, and they all say your wrong!1", reply to this thread. Otherwise, stand down.

40

Re: If Bush ran against Jesus

What the hell is an "ushad"? What word is even close to be spelled like that?

It was a typo (missing space).

The words were us and had...seemed obvious to me.

Theology: The study of elaborate verbal disguises for non-ideas

41

Re: If Bush ran against Jesus

What the hell is an "ushad"? What word is even close to be spelled like that?

It was a typo (missing space).

The words were us and had...seemed obvious to me.

That's because you are able to sink to the level of an idiot and figure out stuff like that first hand.

42

Re: If Bush ran against Jesus

What the hell is an "ushad"? What word is even close to be spelled like that?

It was a typo (missing space).

The words were us and had...seemed obvious to me.

That's because you are able to sink to the level of an idiot and figure out stuff like that first hand.

I have an amazing intellectual range...thanks for noticing  8)

Theology: The study of elaborate verbal disguises for non-ideas

43

Re: If Bush ran against Jesus

It was a typo (missing space).

The words were us and had...seemed obvious to me.

That's because you are able to sink to the level of an idiot and figure out stuff like that first hand.

I have an amazing intellectual range...thanks for noticing  8)

Anytime  wink

44

Re: If Bush ran against Jesus

you kinda remind me of brimstone

Theology: The study of elaborate verbal disguises for non-ideas

45

Re: If Bush ran against Jesus

you kinda remind me of brimstone

That's nice.

46

Re: If Bush ran against Jesus

<sarcasm>
Yes you were right all along, your clearly far more intelligent than P-dwag, Mold, gothic and myself put together. We should bow down to your intellect.  roll
<end sarcasm>
Is that what you wanted to hear?  roll

you kinda remind me of brimstone

You are truely insulting brimstone. For one thing Brimstone could comprehend another persons argument.
Secondly, he could understand the concept of a joke.
Thirdly, he would actually be quite amusing at times
Finally, He often presented his argument in a logical rational way.

Having said all that perhaps it is brimstone playing a nice practical joke on us all? I mean no one could be this ignorant, right?

Anyway, this topic/argument is going nowhere so yet again i will ignore no one at all.

I'm Roachies

47

Re: If Bush ran against Jesus

<sarcasm>
Yes you were right all along, your clearly far more intelligent than P-dwag, Mold, gothic and myself put together. We should bow down to your intellect.  roll
<end sarcasm>
Is that what you wanted to hear?  roll

With the way you are acting right now, It does appear that I am smarter than at least you. And what did that accomplish? All you did was reply with some mindless sarcasm. I never said I was smarter than you guys, I was just saying you are an idiot.

/sarcasm on
Wow, you really showed me!
/sarcasm off

You are truely insulting brimstone. For one thing Brimstone could comprehend another persons argument.
Secondly, he could understand the concept of a joke.
Thirdly, he would actually be quite amusing at times
Finally, He often presented his argument in a logical rational way.

Having said all that perhaps it is brimstone playing a nice practical joke on us all? I mean no one could be this ignorant, right?

I comprehend everyone's arguement. That is why I question it to it's simplist form, then show you that you are wrong. You are confusing ignorance with intelligence. I understand, you are looking for a way out now, just like Gothic. Random insults won't work on me. It helps if you prove how I "do not comprehend your arguements" or how I am "ignorant". Just saying "lol your ignorant" isn't that intelligent of an insult.

Anyway, this topic/argument is going nowhere so yet again i will ignore no one at all.

I win once again.  wink

48

Re: If Bush ran against Jesus

"Nonpareil wrote:

you kinda remind me of brimstone

You are truely insulting brimstone.

lol, am i not merely "kinda" truly insulting brimstome?  lol

Online BB pissing contests...<sigh>

Theology: The study of elaborate verbal disguises for non-ideas

49

Re: If Bush ran against Jesus

Limit the adverbs, buddy.

50

Re: If Bush ran against Jesus

uh oh, the grammar police...

Theology: The study of elaborate verbal disguises for non-ideas