Topic: A conflict between two prominent Players, calling GMs
As for there to be no bias let the names are Sam and Bob.
This is what I have heard and I cannot clarify as truth
Sam bet Bob 50k for a duel. Bob won the first match so Sam gave Bob 50k
From what Sam said, he claimed that one of them wanted a best two out of three match for the 50k. I cannot confirm if that is true or not. According to Bob, an unfair set of rules was laid out so even though Sam won that match, Bob will keep the 50k
Another story is that Bob wasn’t aware that there was a best two out of three for the 50k pot.
This is where I stepped in, in an attempt to settle the matter.
A deciding duel was laid out. Best two out of three. Sam must use his own character and Bob is restricted to using his bow. The only magic allowed is IM. Stealth was banned from the match. Sam used a sword. I took the 50k pot from Bob for safe-keeping.
After three duels with no outside interference, the duel was 2-1 in favor of Sam. Since Sam won, he believed that he deserved the pot. Bob discovered that only the 50k was in the pot and that since Sam didn’t place a additional 50k in the pot, the duel wasn’t legit. Due to that thinking, Bob believed that at least the gold should be split 50/50 between them.
As of this post, I have 50k in my bank and two angry people behind two characters who are mad at me and want the gold. I leave this conflict up to you Faldon, GMs in particular in deciding who the rightful owner of this 50k pot is.
or you could just spilt the current money. Myself I would give 25k to each person.
