Topic: This Topic Rocks
http://www.illusorystudios.com/faldon/m mp;start=0
You are not logged in. Please login or register.
http://www.illusorystudios.com/faldon/m mp;start=0
Hmm it gave me an error when I tried to unlock the topic =p sorry SOAD.
wow. I think I have matured a bit since then. I read my posts, and they sound like they were written by someone with angry weasels in their shorts.
I apologize for being a dumbass.
If you're not a dumbass, you're not a part of our community. So dun worry ^_^
<3
but crov.. wha.. nm
If you're not a dumbass, you're not a part of our community. So dun worry ^_^
<3
you're contradicting yourself again. You claim to be quite intelligent. Should we shun you now, or what?
If you're not a dumbass, you're not a part of our community. So dun worry ^_^
<3
you're contradicting yourself again. You claim to be quite intelligent. Should we shun you now, or what?
In order of ascending lameness:
1. I wouldn't say all definitions of dumbass are contradictary with all definitions of intellgent.
2. When did I ever claim to be intelligent?
3. The adjective 'our' does not necessarily imply my membership. It could imply my ownership.
I don't believe I've ever seen you claim to be intelligent, but you often imply it when you post. You do this by, you know, making sense and stuff. It's a pretty far-out approach to life, I know.
Hmm it gave me an error when I tried to unlock the topic =p sorry SOAD.
That's Ok sweetie! <3 x 5
If you're not a dumbass, you're not a part of our community. So dun worry ^_^
<3
you're contradicting yourself again. You claim to be quite intelligent. Should we shun you now, or what?
In order of ascending lameness:
1. I wouldn't say all definitions of dumbass are contradictary with all definitions of intellgent.
2. When did I ever claim to be intelligent?
3. The adjective 'our' does not necessarily imply my membership. It could imply my ownership.
ok... #2, while never claiming to be intelligent, you believe me (oman) to be a "dumbass". Now then... why exactly do you correct my posts? Do you simply believe yourself to be less of a dumbass? Or a dumbass in a different manner? So then, what is it? Or are you in fact, dare I say it, intelligent?
and #3... what the hell kind of backward ass reasoning is that? You're just being obscure.
#1, I would agree with that, but the only way that would be possible is if dumb and ass were both negatives, and they cancelled each other out. (you do know the reasoning behind double negs in the english language, I hope?)
Go ahead, find some flaw in my arguement. I'm predicting this could go on for years.
Life's a Garden...Dig It!
I apologize for being a dumbass.
ok... #2, while never claiming to be intelligent, you believe me (oman) to be a "dumbass".
I'm sorry, I just took your word for it. I won't do it again ;-)
Now then... why exactly do you correct my posts?
You attacked my logic, I rose to its defense. Your use of the word 'correct' rather implies that I did so successfully.
Do you simply believe yourself to be less of a dumbass? Or a dumbass in a different manner?
Your implication is that one can only be corrected by someone of superior intelligence (or rather, one who believes himself to be). Can I conclude from that, that you consider things such as self-correction or 2 people correcting one another (both believing the other to be equally or more intelligent) paradoxical?
Or are you in fact, dare I say it, intelligent?
Your words, not mine.
and #3... what the hell kind of backward ass reasoning is that? You're just being obscure.
Hence:
In order of ascending lameness:
#1, I would agree with that, but the only way that would be possible is if dumb and ass were both negatives, and they cancelled each other out.
Stop thinking in black and white already.
(you do know the reasoning behind double negs in the english language, I hope?)
Well ain't that precious. Oman is giving me lessons on the English language... -_-
Go ahead, find some flaw in my arguement. I'm predicting this could go on for years.
I like how you used the progressive there. But obviously I can't lecture you on the English language, since you've already been teaching me... and as we established, teaching (which I'd consider an extension of correcting) only works one-way according to your logic. ^_^ *giggles*
You two are so me last year.
Sweet, so does that mean I'm gonna get laid?
Life's a Garden...Dig It!
Must... resist..... urge to... ...make a Pokemon joke...
Argh
Stop thinking in black and white already.
AH! So Oman's a racist! . . .
You think you know somebody . . . and then . . .
You're dead Roy. Stop pretending and fall over all ready.
Stop thinking in black and white already.
AH! So Oman's a racist! . . .
You think you know somebody . . . and then . . .
Oh god! They're gonna get the ARA on my ass!
what the hell is the ARA ....
close enough.
enough?
Yeah, I don't get that. If I was "close enough", it would mean I was wrong, but close enough to count as the same thing. But if it was at all different, then it would be an entirely different organization. And I could in no way be close enough to count.
Mold. You just blew my mind.
Currently installed 5 official extensions. Copyright © 2003–2009 PunBB.